DARK LOCHNAGAR View RSS

RIGHT THAT'S IT. THE GLOVES ARE OFF! FROM NOW ON, I'M JUST GOING TO SAY WHAT I THINK!
Hide details



IS IT JUST ME? 17 Oct 2013 1:45 AM (11 years ago)

Is it just me who is getting more 'socialist' as they get older?  I thought you were supposed to get more right wing as you got older, you know the 'ang 'em, flog 'em brigade.  Now don't get me wrong.  I would rather cut off my right arm than vote Labour.  I supposed because they no longer look after the workers.  All of the main parties in the UK are for the 'hard working middle classes' and there is not even a ba' hair between them.  I despair for the 'working class' guy, if such a thing still exists.  Who represents him?  No one.  Even the Trade Union leaders are making in excess of £100,000 a year and in my opinion you can't make that sort of money and still be 'working class'.  These people are under great pressure.  Short term contracts, unemployment, low wages, part time work, disability and unemployment benefit under attack by millionaires like IDS, who married into wealth and married a Viscount's daughter.  Oh yes, you can take the attitude like the 'Daily Mail' and pick out the 0.001% who are immigrants and are living in the huge house in London with their 16 children and making £30,000 on benefits, but when you average it out that is less than £2,000 per year, per child and most of that sum is paid in housing benefit anyway.  This the reason that I am a Scottish Nationalist.  I want to be represented by people who have me and the good of the country at heart.  Not morons, that we have sent to London to 'represent' us and after 10 minutes get a big head as they 'work', when they are not in the bar, in Westminster with it's archaic ways, dickheads who are called, 'my
honourable friend', what a load of piss!  Even worse is the 'upper' house, where political pricks, who were never any good at anything like, 'Lord' Prescott for instance walk about in ermine, spouting crap about anything that the lobbyists will pay them for, as they line their pockets and look down on the working man.   Bankers who have criminally robbed the country get away with it and are punished by their ennoblement taken away and losing £50,000 per year out of their £850,000 a year pension.  Former 'New Labour' PMs like that fucker, Blair are lining their pockets being paid by regimes who when they were in power were demonised for their suppression and murder of their own people, like Khazakstan for instance.  Thank fuck I'm in Spain!

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

IS IT SHORTLY GOING TO BE US OUT ON THE STREETS? 19 Sep 2013 10:26 AM (11 years ago)

I haven't posted for a while.  I have been settling into life in Spain, lucky bastard that I am!  Anyway, it seems to me that with a few short years we are going to have a 'civil war' of sorts.  We are increasingly becoming subject to a Global security system organised by our politicians in hand with the companies that most of us abhor.  Arms dealers, multinationals etc. and the money, as we all know, is flowing into politicians hands.  Who in Britain or elsewhere has been ever jailed for their fraud?  Yet, fraud benefits are threatened with a 10 year sentence.  Now, I don't disagree that people who are running non-existent benefit claimants should be hammered.  But, the silly young girl who is claiming single parent allowance and lets her current thick boyfriend to stay a couple of nights a week?  It seems to me that us, the people, are being suppressed from above and when, and if, the thick bastards in the U.K. ever wake up there is going to be blood on the streets!

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?



” How to wage a war upon the poor.
Probably the most disgusting thing about this coalition has been their propaganda war against the most disadvantaged people in society. By the deliberate spreading of lies, they have facilitated a systematic assault upon the poor, the sick and the disabled. And they have knowingly misled the public for one simple reason, to enable them to totally dismantle the welfare state.
There are lies, damned lies, and then there are lying Tory bastards.
The welfare state has led to a ‘something for nothing’ culture?
It may be utterly repugnant to hear millionaire politicians who have never worked a day in their life telling us that they are ending the ‘something for nothing culture’, but it’s also utter bollocks. Only 2.5% of the total welfare budget of £200 billion actually goes on unemployment, whilst the vast majority of unemployed claimants have worked, and paid taxes, for years and are now on benefits due to redundancy, sickness, disability or having to care for someone. Millions more are receiving benefits due to poverty wages. The Welfare state is actually a massive state subsidy to business which enables it to pay poverty wages and charge exorbitant rents.
Living on benefits is a lifestyle choice?
Only 0.1% of benefit claimants who have claimed for 10 years or more are actually unemployed. Less than 5,000 people, out of over 9 million 16-64 year olds who don’t work, have been on Job Seekers Allowance for more than 5 years. Less than 0.1% of the 20 million working age households have 2 generations that have never had a permanent job. Despite strenuous efforts, researchers have been unable to find any families where three generations have never worked.
People won’t work because benefits are too high?
In 1971, JSA equalled 20.9% of the average wage. Today, it is worth 10.9%. These people are living in poverty. There are 8.5 million people receiving benefits in this country. There are more people IN WORK who get benefits than not working. The majority of all housing benefit claimants are IN WORK. 6.1 million people classed as living in poverty are from households IN WORK.
People on housing benefit live in mansions?
Our newspapers continuously bombard us with these stories. There are around five million claimants of Housing Benefit; of which there were five families who received over £100,000 per year, all living in central London. The average award of Housing Benefit is approximately £85 a week. Only 3% of families received more than £10,000 a year support, and 0.04% received more than £30,000 a year. And no-one ever mentions that housing benefit goes straight to the Landlord and not the claimant.
And those large families screwing the taxpayer? There are around 130 families with 10 children and only 10 families with 12 children IN THE WHOLE COUNTRY who are on benefits.
Benefit cheats are bankrupting the country?
Benefit fraud amounts to about £1.5 billion a year, less than 1% of the entire budget. To put this in perspective, the bank bailout equalled 1,000 years of benefit fraud. Meanwhile, £1.3 billion gets underpaid each year and a further £16 billion goes UNCLAIMED every year.
We can no longer afford the welfare state?
So who is really bankrupting the country? Well, the richest 1,000 people now possess £414 billion between them, a sum more than three times the size of the entire UK budget deficit. The richest 1% of the population are estimated to possess wealth of about £1 trillion. The richest 10% control wealth of about £4 trillion. The Quantitative Easing programme has increased the personal wealth of the UK’s richest 20% by enough to pay for Job Seeker’s Allowance for the next 100 years.
The people of this country are being shafted, but instead of the blame being directed at the real culprits, the rich, it is being aimed at the most vulnerable, the poor, with our own Government shamelessly leading the way.
And every one who believes their bullshit should hang their heads in shame.”

There’s a storm coming…

Bullet Resistant Tyres (Ultraseal GB) 12 Jul 2012 11:41 AM (12 years ago)

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

WHY WE SHOULD BE ASHAMED TO BE IN AFGHANISTAN. 6 Jul 2012 4:26 PM (12 years ago)

The following video is of an American pilot singing "Bye, bye , Miss American pie', as he blows up an Afghan civilian.  Is this really what we want to be associated with in Scotland?

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

10 REASONS WHY SCOTLAND SHOULD BE INDEPENDENT 22 May 2012 3:36 PM (12 years ago)

1 Scotland would officially be one of the world's richest countries - ranked 6th in the OECD compared to the UK's 16th place. We have 24billion barrels of oil remaining in the North Sea, according to industry body Oil and Gas UK. That's £1.5trillion in today's prices - half as much in value as has been taken out.
2 We also have around 25 per cent of Europe's potential offshore wind and tidal energy - and a tenth of Europe's wave power. An extra 45 per cent of renewable energy was generated in Scotland last year, according to the UK Department of Energy. It's more than we need and can be exported for cash.
3 Other countries want to invest here. The recent Ernst & Young UK Attractiveness Survey highlighted Scotland's leading position in the UK for job creation from international investment. With independence, we can make the country even more attractive to these employers.
4 Independence will allow us to keep services such as the NHS and the welfare state. In England they are being privatised and cut. Benefits are being taken from the needy and the Scottish Parliament can't stop that under present powers.
5 Scotland has five of the top 200 universities in the world. We also punch well above our weight in the number of research papers they produce. It means our historic reputation as a well educated nation is flourishing. We give our universities one of the best packages of support in Europe, with no fees for students from Scotland. With independence we can do even more.
6 We'll have more money in our pockets. If we got back what we sent south in tax, official figures show every Scot would have £510 more a year. The only tax the Scottish Government controls just now is council tax, and it's frozen under the SNP. Imagine if we controlled fuel duty, national insurance, VAT and income tax.
7 Our government would be more streamlined. Scotland, like Denmark, New Zealand, Norway and Finland, is a goldilocks country - not too big and not too small. The UK wastes money on bloated institutions bogged down by bureaucracy - look at HMRC, the tax authority. It's gone from one calamity to another. The rich get away with evasion while the rest are overcharged.
8 Mobiles would work and we'd all get high-speed broadband. Telecommunications are controlled in London. Westminster auctions licences to phone companies but only demands 90 per cent coverage of the UK. This means "notspots" in much of Scotland. Broadband is patchy too, and it doesn't help that Scotland's capital budget has been cut by a third by the Tories.
9 Our culture would get a boost. We'd have control over broadcasting and more high-quality programmes could be made here. Our news would no longer look hand-knitted compared with well funded UK offerings. We could export high-quality drama and our young bands would have a platform on the radio.
10 Imagine the goodwill. Scotland is held in high regard around the world - by those who know us. But being buried in brand Britain means sometimes we don't get to shine as we should. Independence would generate global interest. We would be the new kid on the block - young, modern, and happening.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

NEW GREEN MODE OF TRANSPORT INVENTED IN SCOTLAND 22 May 2012 12:19 PM (12 years ago)


Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

I'M NOT SURE THE EUROZONE WILL BREAK UP! 16 May 2012 3:55 PM (12 years ago)

I've been following this debate about the Euro for well over a year now, as I am waiting to complete on a small house in Spain.  

I am no longer convinced that  the Eurozone is going to break up.  Alth ough the € has gone from £1.10 to £1.25, which is great for me, I don't think it is an economic decision any more but rather a political one.

I watched tonight a programme I had  taped where Michael Portillo goes to Greece and all parts of Germany to ask if they want to stay in the Euro and to a man and woman, they did.

When you are on the continent for any length of time your attitude to Europe and the Euro tends to change.  We in Britain have a sort of snobbish, standoffish attitude towards Europe and the Eurozone.  Now, while I am in Scotland, I don't want to see us joining, but when I am in Spain, it somehow seems ,OK.  How can that be?

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

MY TWOPENCE WORTH ON MINIMUM ALCOHOL PRICING 14 May 2012 3:18 PM (12 years ago)

BEER SHAMPOO HITS £10 A TUBE!
Minimum alcohol pricing, there's a quandry.

We have to face up to the  fact that we in the UK and more particularly in Scotland, have a big problem with alcohol.  When you go to Spain or France the only drunks you see are Brit tourists or occasionally a North European.  Some of the scenes in our city centres on a Saturday night are a disgrace.  Some people will say that is because drink is so dear that people get hammered in the house before they go out.  So should we make drink cheaper?  Would that bring in a more responsible attitude to drinking?  Personally I doubt it. But, then I suppose you could say that it is much cheaper in Spain where I drink a reasonable wine for £0.65 a litre and Spaniards don't get pissed, even at the football.

Now I speak as one who has drunk like a fish for most of his life, so I think I might have some input here.  I do in principle support minimum pricing but I do believe that £0.50 a unit is too dear.  How, if it gets through the courts, can we charge £0.50 when in England, they are looking to bring in a price of £0.40.  Ridiculous.  And why should we hand the supermarkets a £100 million bonus?  Those bastards have ravaged our town centres, turning them into 'tesco extras', charity shops and bookies.  I'd clobber any multinational in an out of town centre till they felt their orange pips squeeze.  

Is it possible to take this money off them and use it to pay for alcohol education for our young?  I don't know.  But, I will tell you one thing.  This is what a responsible Government means to the people of Scotland.  The SNP and it could be rightly or wrongly in your estimation had this policy as part of their manifesto despite the fact that Labour, the Tories and the Libdums were against it in the last parliament and they know it will lose them votes, but they have the interests of Scotland's people at heart.  Suddenly of course, CamaClegg have decided they are in favour so the Libdums and the Tories have changed their tune.  So in other words, they are not interested in the health of the people of Scotland, just in their narrow Unionist policies.  Plus ca change as my French brothers say!


Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

ARE WE BEING LET DOWN BY OUR LEADERS IN THE WESTERN WORLD? 13 May 2012 2:35 AM (12 years ago)


Western 'leaders'.  Let's have a look at them:

America-President Obama was elected by an electorate who wanted change from the fuckwit who was Bush.  Under him however, the Bush policies have been followed rigidly.  They've still got Guantanimo, shit health care, expensive military expenditure and the electorate are controlled almost as much as in Britain by 'Homeland Security'.  The politicians are all in thrall to globalist businesses who fund their campaigns.

France-Sarkozy has gone to be replaced by M. Ordinaire, Hollande.  He at least sees the need to stimulate the economy a little to get some demand going but wants to do it by dragging the French economy back to the 1970s.

Germany-The mad frau Merkel, in thrall to the bankers and anti stimulation of the economy, which appears to be the only one in Europe which is working.  The Germans always said that after losing two World Wars, they would win the third, i.e. the economic one.

Russia-Putin's grip over Russia is entering it's third five year plan.  The country is totally corrupt from top to bottom.

Spain-Rajoy holds sway over a nation where more than one in two of young people are out of work.  well when I say out of work, I mean official work, because the black economy is endemic in Spain and until he tackles that and pulls out of the EURO so that the vast housing stocks which the banks hold, can be sold off at a realistic price, Spain will never recover.

Greece and Italy-they don't have politicians in charge, but central bankers imposed by the ECB, so they don't count.

Then of course, we come to Britain.  A country presided over by two toffs who have at the very least been corrupted by the Murdochs, if it doesn't turn out to be more serious.  A country where the much heralded, anti-lobbying bill has been put on the back burner.  How many palms have been and are getting greased?  Only time MIGHT tell.  Cameron, it could be said, would be hard pushed to run a pissup in a brewery and looks to be totally out of his depth.  And the solution to Cameron?  Are we really suggesting that Boris Johnston should be the Prime Minister.  He's a halfwit!  It's even enough to make you nostalgic for Gordon Brown!

It's maybe time that we realise that our type of democracy isn't working and we have to find a better way of running our countries, because at the moment we are on a very slippery slope to financial oblivion or another world war, just to stimulate the World's economies!

Boris-front right

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

THE OLYMPIC FLAME IS ON IT'S WAY! 11 May 2012 8:03 AM (12 years ago)


Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

TODAY, A GREAT SCOTTISH CITY, GLASGOW, FINALLY DIED. 4 May 2012 4:14 PM (12 years ago)

Today a great Scottish city and many would say the "greatest Scottish city", Glasgow, finally died.

Glasgow was once known as the second city of the Empire.  It's engineering capacity and Universities were the envy of the world.  It had more parkland than any other city in Europe.  Yet, today, after being shit upon from a great height for 60 odd years by a narrow, entrenched, drug taking, corrupt, Scottish Labour dictatorship, they finally made it clear that they are the thick numpty bastards  that the rest of Scotland knew they were.

When at last they had the chance to get out from under the socialist jackboot and vote for a superior and optimistic future, fewer than one in three could be bothered to get off their lardy arses and do it.  Why not?  Was there something good on 'Eastenders', that their Sky boxes paid for, by the rest of us workers couldn't record?  Or were they just too thick to stand up for themselves like the rest of Scotland and see what damage has been done to their community over the years by Labour?  That is the Labour who have used the tried and tested, 'mushroom' theory of keeping them in the dark and feeding them shit, over the last 60 years.  It makes you wonder how many election irregularities will be picked up this time?  Aye, but they'll tell you, "my family has always voted Labour since we came from the Irish potato famine/the Ayrshire coalmines/the Great Depression/the General Strike/the siege of Calcutta"  and what is it you do now?  "Well, I run my own business/I'm a university professor/I'm a senior manager/I'm a company director, etc, etc.  Pricks!

Ach well, fuck 'em, if they're too thick to see what their lives have become, why should the rest of us worry?

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

WHERE DOES MONEY COME FROM? A MUST SEE. 1 May 2012 7:51 AM (12 years ago)

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

WHO'S ALL IN RECESSION? 30 Apr 2012 6:17 AM (12 years ago)

Click here to see what EU countries are in recession.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

HOW CAN DANIEL RADCLIFFE BE WORTH £54m? 29 Apr 2012 3:43 PM (12 years ago)

 

Now on this blog, I don't attest to the politics of envy.  I think if someone is a brilliant brain surgeon, engineer or entrepreneur they deserve all they get.

But browsing through the Murdoch rag that my wife likes to get on a Sunday, I noticed that amongst their 'rich list' was a certain Daniel Radcliffe, an actor I believe of the mature age of 22.

Now, I understand that he was some sort of principal character in a number of films about some supposed boy wizard.  Never having seen any of them, I can't make a comment about his talent, I think there has been about 6.  But, can anyone tell me how the fuck he is  now worth £56 MILLION!    Yes, I did say MILLION.   It's fucking obscene!  Now you could say that footballers are overpaid and I wouldn't disagree with you. But at least they have relatively short careers.  Radcliffe could be acting well into his 70s!

So what are his particular talents?  He does what the director tells him.  His agent obviously makes a pile.  He looks, I believe gawky and half witted at least in the early films.  What risk does he take if his talents are no longer viable?  What happens if he breaks a leg and hobbles for the rest of his life?

My answer would be fuck all.  And the sad part?  Struggling families will pay to see his  films and idolise him because he was chosen to appear in a number of films.  Oh, and her that wrote it?  Only ten times more on £540 Million.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

WHY DO WE HAVE TO HAVE THIS BASTARD TAYLOR IN THE UK AT THE COST OF £100,000 PER YEAR? 27 Apr 2012 6:36 AM (12 years ago)

 

FORMER Liberian dictator Charles Taylor was today found guilty of sponsoring a brutal civil war that left tens of thousands dead.
Taylor, the first head of state to be convicted by an international court since the Second World War, will serve his sentence in a British jail at a cost of around £100,000 a year.

Can anyone tell me why we have to have him here at the cost of £100,000 per year?  When is Britain going to get off it's high horse and realise that we are skint and no longer a major world power?  Are our big headed politicians to blame or is it the 'majesty' of the Monarchy and our no longer existent Empire?  How long did it get the Greeks and Romans to get over the fact that they no longer ruled half of their know world?

The Yanks have got it right.  Just change the Government when they threaten to start to sell their oil in any other currency apart from the $ollar!

P.S.  Are they going after that fucker Blair NEXT?

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

MUON FUSION-THE WAY AHEAD FOR CHEAP, GREEN, SAFE ENERY PRODUCTION. 25 Apr 2012 3:11 PM (12 years ago)

The way ahead for energy production, in my estimation will not be Nuclear, Renewables or fossil fuels, it will be by a new process called Muon Fusion, which is currently nearing final testing in Australia by a company called Star Scientific Ltd.

This process which I admit is a bit difficult to comprehend unless you are a scientist, takes seawater and fuses certain atoms together to eventually produce steam which drives turbines.  The only waste is an inert gas which won't cause damage to the environment and because it is fusion, rather than fission, is safe and can't be used for weapons.

It will of course, do away very shortly with renewable energy, which will please Mr Trump and I know that many Governments are aware of what's happening around the world, INCLUDING the Scottish one.

Let's hope that new cheap energy is not exploited by the global market to make millions and keep energy prices at the rate they are while they make even more money from the long suffering public.  Certainly the stated aim of the Chairman of Star Scientific is to make sure that their process is not exploited by the World's energy giants.  A further independent report is available here.



Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

A WEE GREEK QUIZ 25 Apr 2012 9:20 AM (12 years ago)

Greeks are revolting



We already know that Greece borrowed most of its debt from the ECB and American banks. We also know that US banking firm Goldman Sachs held a seminar in Greece during 2006 aimed at 'teaching' the then Athens Government how to lie to Brussels about the size of its borrowings.
There now follows a Q&A about other aspects of Greek debt.
Question: Who is the third biggest arms importer in the world, behind India and China?
Answer: Greece
Question: If Greece had spent the EU average on defence over the past 10 years (1.7% of GDP
rather than spending 4% of GDP on defence, how much money would it have saved?
Answer: 52% of GDP, or 150billion euros
So why are France and Germany not demanding that Greece cuts its defence spending?
Question: In the period 2006-2010 which country was Germany’s largest market for munitions?
Answer: Greece, which accounted for 15% of total German arms sales.
Question: In the same period, what country was France’s largest arms export market in Europe (third
largest overall)?
Answer: Greece
Question: In 2010 (last year data is available) social spending in Greece was cut by 1.8bn Euros.
How much did military spending change? Was it...
a) Decreased by Euro 900 million
b) No change
c) Increased by Euro 900million
Answer: C
Yesterday, Greece's central bank governor said his country would have to leave the eurozone if politicians do not stick to the austerity programme after the elections due to take place on 6 May.
"What is at stake is the choice between an orderly, albeit painstaking, effort to reconstruct the economy within the euro area, with the support of our partners, or a disorderly economic and social regression, taking the country several decades back, and eventually driving it out of the euro area and the European Union," George Provopoulos told the media.
On March 23rd this year, Greece signed up to a second, €130 billion loan paid mainly by other eurozone countries to reduce the country's debt and recapitalise its banks, along with a major debt restructuring agreed with private lenders. Had it not bought all those arms from France and Germany, of course, Greece wouldn't have a problem at all.
Conclusion: The other 25 eurozone States are all paying for the Franco-German arms industry.

h/t john Ward

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

WHY HAS OSBORNE PLEDGED A FURTHER £10 BILLION TO THE IMF? 21 Apr 2012 3:24 AM (12 years ago)

A sly looking bastard if ever I saw one!


Just why has osborne pledged another £10 billion of our money to the IMF, which in turn is supporting the Eurozone.

The IMF is set up to help out individual countries like in  Africa to develop their economies.  It is not their job to prop up the Euro which is plainly on it's way out.  That is why the USA has NOT pledged any more money to the IMF, because it knows when the Euro goes down the tubes as will happen sooner or later, there is a good chance they won't get their money back.  I very rarely agree with anything Ed Balls says but this time he is right.

The IMF has a vital role to play in the global economy and must be properly resourced. But the IMF’s job is to support individual countries with solvency crises, not to support a whole monetary union which cannot agree the necessary steps to maintain itself. The IMF cannot and should not become the de facto central bank of the euro area.

It's come to a pretty pass, when a supposed Euro sceptic party is propping up a Euro system that can't survive.  When are these fuckers going to stand up for Britain???

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

PETROL 20 Apr 2012 6:31 AM (13 years ago)


Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

SHOULD STRAW BE CHARGED OR BE MADE TO PAY COMPENSATION? 19 Apr 2012 2:18 AM (13 years ago)


Just how culpable should politicians be for their decisions?  In signing off on the sending of the man above for rendition to Libya and his alleged torture, should Straw be charged with a criminal offence?  If Behadj gets compensation through the courts, should Straw have to pay it?  Does the culpability go all the way to the top and should it then involve the PM at the time, Blair.

Is there anyone who wouldn't want to see that bastard, hung, drawn and quartered?

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

LAGARDE-"I'VE GOT THE MONEY FROM THE IMF, I'M OFF"! 17 Apr 2012 4:10 PM (13 years ago)


Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

SEVEN REASONS WHY SCOTLAND WOULD BE BETTER OFF INDEPENDENT! 16 Apr 2012 8:03 AM (13 years ago)



7 Key Strengths of Scotland’s Economy
The Scottish Government has outlined the positive case for independence, highlighting Scotland’s seven key economic strengths.
1.     Overall Wealth: An independent Scotland would be ranked 6th in the OECD in terms of GDP per head, compared to the UK's sixteenth place (in 2010).
2.      Oil: There is up to 24 billion barrels remaining in the North Sea. Such a figure equates to a wholesale value of some £1.5 trillion in today's prices.
3.      Renewables: Scotland has around 25 percent of Europe’s potential offshore wind and tidal energy, and a tenth of Europe’s wave power potential.
4.      Food & Drink:  The latest food and drink export figures show exports are at an all time high of £5.4 billion, and growing.
5.      Public Finances: In terms of our public finances, Scotland is better off than the UK as a whole to the tune of £510 for every man, women and child in Scotland in the most recent year (2010/11).
6.      Education: Scotland has five of the top 200 universities in the world.
7.      Inward Investment: Scottish Development International are an award winning agency, with major companies continuing to locate in Scotland.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

AND YOU THOUGHT GOLF WAS BORING! 14 Apr 2012 9:47 AM (13 years ago)

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

CAT FOUND. 14 Apr 2012 4:04 AM (13 years ago)

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?