Medic Debate View RSS

• Real dangers of “vaccines” are ignored

•  The authors confirm the limitation regarding the unknown origin of the vaccine vials, which were sent anonymously and without cold packs. All monovalent vaccines examined in this study had expired beyond the expiration date stated on the vial. This raises concerns about storage conditions and the potential degradation of RNA relative to DNA, which could skew DNA-to-RNA ratios. Control experiments using vials of known origin and storage history would have been crucial to validate the results.

•  Plasmide DNA was not detected directly, but only indirectly via the unacceptable and highly distorting process of sequencing ("puzzle"), instead of direct detection by isolating the plasmids.

•  It would have to be proven that these inserted plasmids are located in human chromosomes. This was not done either, although it would be easy if one followed the basic assumptions of their hypothesis.

•  The central investigation was the contamination ratio of DNA to RNA. The study that Prof. Bhakdi plans to present claims DNA contamination in vaccine samples based on a comparison of the ratio of RNA to DNA.
  However, this approach is misleading because the RNA degrades quickly if not refrigerated. The mRNA vaccines usually need to be stored at -70 to -80 degrees Celsius to prevent RNA degradation. If this standard is not met, the rapid loss of RNA leads to an apparently increased proportion of DNA, which can be incorrectly interpreted as DNA contamination. The study results are therefore compromised by improper storage and are not reliable.

In the nineteenth century, “virus” commonly meant an agent (usually unknown) that caused disease in inoculation experiments. By the 1890s, however, some disease-causing agents were found to pass through filters that retained the common bacteria. Such an agent was called “filterable virus,” the best known being the virus that caused tobacco mosaic disease. By the 1920s there were many examples of filterable viruses, but no clear understanding of their nature. However, by the 1930s, the term “filterable virus” was being abandoned in favor of simply “virus,” meaning an agent other than bacteria. Visualization of viruses by the electron microscope in the late 1930s finally settled their particulate nature. This article describes the ever-changing concept of “virus” and how virologists talked about viruses. These changes reflected their invention and reinvention of the concept of a virus as it was revised in light of new knowledge, new scientific values and interests, and new hegemonic technologie."

https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-virology-031413-085432

1. Control 1: Fresh culture medium - as standard control. (optimal condition)
2. Control 2: DMEM (culture medium) supplemented with GlutaMAX, FCS and antibiotics.
3. Starvation 1: DMEM with reduced FCS (fetal calf serum) and increased antibiotics to simulate nutritional deprivation.
4. Starvation 2: Like group 3, but additionally treated with yeast RNA (foreign nucleic acids).

3. We get the central effect (CPE), the death of tissue cells in the test tube, in the same way, without any infected material.

4. The morphological change in cell culture is caused by poisoning and starvation.

5, This cell culture (e.g. B. Vero E6) is virtually poisoned by certain chemicals and antibiotics, at the same time the nutrient solution is taken away from it, it literally "starvees". The "poisoning" is carried out out of the belief that one wants to make sure that no other causes for a desired effect are to be regarded as responsible. The nutrient solution is withdrawn from the cells because they want to make them hungry, so that they absorb the alleged "viruses" better. Unfortunately, it is precisely these two precautions - poisoning and starvation - that are the cause of an effect to occur that is also equated with indirect proof of the isolation, cultivation and destructive power of a pathogenic virus. A fatal IRRTUM!

6. The This effect can even be massively amplified if you e.g. B., as Dr. Stefan Lanka had it carried out in the laboratory,
Adds so-called standardized yeast messenger substance (the RNA from yeasts).

7. All control results carried out confirmed that the cause of the so-called cytopathic effect is not a virus, but factors such as the experimental setup are the cause.

8. These control tests have not yet been carried out or documented by all virologists worldwide, until today they are ignored.

9. The virologists do not use the word "isolation" in the true sense of the word isolation. They understand by "isolation" the generation of the cytopathic effect in the laboratory, which they simultaneously as

A) Infection

B) Proof of the presence of a virus

C) Proof of its multiplication

D) Interpret evidence of the destructive power of the assumed virus.

10.The virologists call these dying tissue/cells an isolate, which they then put on the market for approx. 2,000 euros and falsely claim that there is a virus in it. In addition, the virologists claim that they can produce a vaccine from it.