Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices View RSS

No description
Hide details



MGMA Supports ICD-10 Testing With Outside Organizations 30 Jul 2013 5:52 AM (11 years ago)

On Tuesday, the Medical Group Management Association sent a letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius urging CMS to conduct ICD-10 testing with outside organizations, FierceHealthIT reports (Bowman, FierceHealthIT, 7/23).

Background

U.S. health care organizations are working to transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 code sets to accommodate codes for new diseases and procedures. The switch from ICD-9 to ICD-10 code sets means that health care providers and insurers will have to change out about 14,000 codes for about 69,000 codes.

In August 2012, HHS released a final rule that officially delayed the ICD-10 compliance date from Oct. 1, 2013, to Oct. 1, 2014, partially to look at the incremental changes needed in reforming health care.

There were rumors that CMS had decided not to conduct “external, end-to-end” testing with outside organizations for ICD-10 claims flows.

During an HHS National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics Subcommittee on Standards hearing in June, Cathy Carter — director of the business applications management group in CMS’ office of information services — said, “I don’t believe there was ever a plan [for Medicaid administrative contractors] to test with providers all the way through.” Carter said, “The announcement everyone is talking about wasn’t really an announcement.”

She said that CMS officials have informally agreed to discuss the issue in response to negative comments but expressed little optimism that CMS would change its plans, citing a lack of funding and time (iHealthBeat, 6/20).

MGMA Letter

In the letter, MGMA President and CEO Susan Turney said she is “extremely concerned” about CMS’ decision, adding that outside testing could help to avoid a potential “catastrophic back-log of Medicare claims” after the Oct. 1, 2014 compliance date (FierceHealthIT, 7/23).

Turney wrote, “ICD-10 will be one of the most significant changes the physician practice community has ever undertaken — impacting both the clinical and administrative sides of every care delivery organization,” adding, “End-to-end testing between trading partners is absolutely critical to measure operational predictability and readiness, and also to identify any roadblocks well in advance of the compliance date.”

She added, “Failure to do so could result in significant cash flow disruption for physicians and their practices, and serious access to care issues for Medicare patients.”

The letter concluded, “We believe it is imperative that you address this concern without delay and direct Medicare to conduct ICD-10 end-to-end testing with all external trading partners” (Goedert, Health Data Management, 7/23).

Source: iHealthBeat

The post MGMA Supports ICD-10 Testing With Outside Organizations appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

Report: Many EHR Users Set To Replace Systems Within the Next Year 30 Jul 2013 5:48 AM (11 years ago)

Many physician practices seeking to replace their current electronic health record system plan to do so within the next year, according to a Black Book Rankings report, Healthcare IT News reports.

The report is a follow-up assessment to a study released earlier this year (McCann, Healthcare IT News, 7/23).

Findings of Previous Study

A study by Black Book Rankings released in February found that 17% of physician practices are considering switching electronic health record vendors by the end of 2013.

It also found that of the physician practices interested in switching EHR vendors:

Findings of New Report

The new report found that:

The report found that the most popular vendors for replacement EHR systems were:

According to the report, other vendors that received top rankings in client satisfaction were:

Source: iHealthBeat

The post Report: Many EHR Users Set To Replace Systems Within the Next Year appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

Providers, Vendors Urge Congress To Delay Meaningful Use Stage 2 30 Jul 2013 5:47 AM (11 years ago)

During a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Wednesday, health care providers and health IT vendors recommended that Stage 2 of the meaningful use program be delayed by one year until Oct. 1, 2015, Government Health IT reports (Sullivan, Government Health IT, 7/24).

Background

Under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package, health care providers who demonstrate meaningful use of certified electronic health record systems can qualify for Medicaid and Medicare incentive payments.

More than 50% of eligible health care professionals and 80% of eligible hospitals have begun using EHR systems since the meaningful use program launched in 2011, according to CMS.

So far, the Obama administration has paid almost 310,000 health care providers a total of $15.5 billion for implementing EHR systems, according to CMS.

During a Senate Finance Committee hearing earlier this month, National Coordinator for Health IT Farzad Mostashari and Patrick Conway — director of CMS’ Center for Clinical Standards and Quality –pushed back against lawmakers’ requests to delay the program (iHealthBeat, 7/18).

Details of Provider, Vendor Concerns

During the hearing, providers and vendor representatives said Stage 2 of the meaningful use program is too rigid and could increase the digital divide between urban and rural caregivers.

John Glaser — CEO of Siemens Health Services — said other federal government mandates — such as the ICD-10 transition, payment reforms and new care models — combined with Stage 2 of the meaningful use program could create a “perfect storm” to cripple hospitals (Government Health IT, 7/24).

He warned that “many providers may opt out of further participation” in the meaningful use program if deadlines are not changed.

Glaser recommended that lawmakers delay the implementation of Stage 2 for one year and reconfigure the program to have each stage take three years.

Marty Fattig — CEO of Nemaha County Hospital, a 20-bed facility in Nebraska — noted that “most rural hospitals have yet to meet the exceedingly complex requirements for Stage 1” of the meaningful use program and that executives of such facilities worry that vendors will not be able to accommodate them in the program’s tight time frame.

He added that health IT systems can “introduce risk when things go wrong,” especially if they are “upgraded under severe time constraints” (Reichard, CQ HealthBeat, 7/24).

Pushback Against Suggested Delay

Janet Marchibroda — the health innovation initiative director at the Bipartisan Policy Center — urged lawmakers not to delay the start of Stage 2.

The next phase of the meaningful use program “advances considerably the engagement of patients and you don’t see that much of it in Stage 1,” she said, adding, “The information sharing is the primary driver in reductions in costs that we’ll see through health IT.”

However, Marchibroda suggested that lawmakers could let health care providers — such as accountable care organizations — that have made a lot of health IT progress reap the benefits of Stage 2 of the program, while providing more time for rural and critical access hospitals that are lagging behind (Government Health IT, 7/24).

Meanwhile, the National Partnership for Women and Families in a statement urged lawmakers not to delay the program and criticized the committee for not including patients and family caregivers at the hearing, according to CQ HealthBeat.

Committee Response

Following the hearing, committee Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said he was “[n]ot yet” convinced to delay Stage 2 implementation (CQ HealthBeat, 7/24).

Source: iHealthBeat

The post Providers, Vendors Urge Congress To Delay Meaningful Use Stage 2 appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

Many Doctors May Find Meeting ‘Meaningful Use’ Requirements a Challenge 28 Jun 2013 7:37 AM (11 years ago)

Approximately 80% of physicians do not currently use an electronic health  record system. Unfortunately, this statistic isn’t surprising, given the number  of barriers to adoption, including the high cost of EHR systems and the often  complex process of selecting and implementing new technology. It costs about  $54,000 to purchase an EHR system, with annual maintenance costs of about  $10,000. The HITECH Act aims to address the high cost of adoption by providing  physicians with federal incentives of up to $44,000 for Medicare physicians  and up to $63,750 for Medicaid physicians, if they can meet the “meaningful use”  requirements outlined in the final rule recently released by CMS.

Throughout the meaningful use rulemaking process, the American Medical  Association worked to ensure flexibility for physicians in meeting the  requirements to help make the process of adopting and using EHRs as smooth as  possible. With this final rule, physicians have a clear outline of what they  need to do to take advantage of federal incentives that can help offset the cost  of an EHR system. The final rule offers many improvements over previous drafts,  but challenges do remain that may make it difficult for physicians to meet the  requirements, especially those in solo and small practices.

Let’s start with the good. The final rule reduces the overall number of  measures physicians have to meet during the initial stage of the incentive  program and lowers the high reporting volumes associated with several  measures to a more manageable amount. For example, the requirement for the use  of computerized physician order entry has dropped from 80% to 30% and is now  limited to just medication orders.

The rule also offers greater flexibility in meeting quality measures by  limiting the number of clinical quality measures physicians need to report to  only those with electronic specifications. Physicians are also able to select  quality measures that are most relevant to their practice. Nearly half of the  quality measures approved in the meaningful use rule come from the AMA-convened Physician Consortium for Performance  Improvement, so participating physicians can be assured that many of these  measures were developed through a rigorous, evidence-based and  physician-led process.

The objectives and measures related to administrative simplification have  been removed during the initial stage of the incentive program, allowing  physicians to focus on only meeting requirements that are directly related to an  EHR.  Lastly, CMS has adopted an approach that calls for greater uniformity  and less variation between the two incentive programs in Medicare and Medicaid.

Now for the challenges. Currently there is no EHR in the market that does all  the things required for physicians to successfully meet the meaningful use  criteria. To qualify for incentives, physicians must demonstrate they  meaningfully use EHRs for a minimum of 90 consecutive days in 2011. CMS expects  EHR systems that support meaningful use to become available this fall, giving  physicians less than a year to purchase, implement and begin using EHR  technology in accordance with the requirements. This is no small feat,  considering it can take a year or more for some physician practices to  purchase and implement an EHR system.

While the final rule does reduce the overall number of measures physicians  must meet, requiring physicians to meet 20 measures in the first year is still a  very high bar, especially for smaller practices that are new to the technology.  Those physicians who have already invested substantially in EHR technology will  now have to upgrade their systems to meet the certification criteria in order to  be eligible for incentives.

Despite the challenges, a properly implemented EHR system can help streamline  the clinical and business functions of a physician practice and support  physicians with providing coordinated, patient-centered, quality health  care. AMA is committed to helping physicians overcome barriers to implementation  so they can successfully adopt EHR technology in their practices and qualify for  federal incentives.

Source: iHealthBeat

The post Many Doctors May Find Meeting ‘Meaningful Use’ Requirements a Challenge appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

When it Comes to ICD-10 Physician Documentation: Collaborate and Educate 28 Jun 2013 7:36 AM (11 years ago)

Most hospitals and health systems have made progress related to the ICD-10  transition, but there undoubtedly is still more work to be done. Many have  completed their readiness assessment, identified ICD-10 leadership, assembled  their ICD-10 workgroups, planned coder, documentation specialist and other staff  education, identified necessary IT infrastructure requirements and recognized  the need to renegotiate payer contracts that reference ICD-9 codes. Still, even  if all the above elements are in place, on time and functioning well, ICD-10  holds the potential to devastate a hospital’s revenue cycle integrity leading to  short-term, if not long-term, losses in revenue.

Another critical piece missing from the list above is: Assuring that your  medical staff is ready for the ICD-10 transition. Although many argue ICD-10 is  a coding issue requiring coding solutions, we see time and time again surveys  that identify physician education as the most difficult challenge in preparing  for ICD-10. Why the inconsistency? It actually makes sense from an operational  perspective. We can mandate that coders attend necessary education, purchase  computer-assisted coding (CAC) solutions and negotiate with vendors to assure  that all IT platforms are ICD-10 compliant. But how do you mandate appropriate  documentation for ICD-10 from your independent physicians? Short answer… you  don’t. It won’t work. That is the most likely reason many health systems have  turned a blind eye to the issue of physician documentation for ICD-10. There is  a better answer — don’t mandate; collaborate and educate. 

Peer-to-Peer Education Is Best

I have been very impressed by the collegial response by physicians of all  specialties when ICD-10 education is focused on their practice. Physicians are  life-long learners and are interested in better documenting patients’ clinical  conditions, particularly when framed in regards to the effect on outcomes and  their workflow and practice.

However, many are still trying to find a “workaround” to avoid direct  physician education. First and foremost, many health systems are looking at CAC  as a bridge from inadequate physician documentation to efficient coding. It is  not. We know that inadequate physician documentation has been a challenge under  ICD-9. If documentation does not improve, CAC will provide so many erroneous  codes to coders that the level of rework will be highly frustrating, requiring  many iterative queries to physicians. In turn physicians will be angry,  resentful and non-collaborative with a system that appears from a clinical  perspective to be duplicative, time-consuming and adversarial. We must provide  peer-to-peer, specialty-specific education regarding the specific documentation  requirements for diagnoses and procedures as an integral part of overall ICD-10  planning.

Extending a Helping Hand to the Independent Physician

According to a 2010 MGMA survey, the U.S. health care system experienced a  steady transition from independent physician-owned medical groups to  hospital/health system employment models. Let us assume, for the moment, that  hospital-owned practices, due to their affiliation with organizations developing  ICD-10 expertise and infrastructure, will be at least relatively prepared for  the ICD-10 transition. What will the impact be on health systems when  independent physicians and physician groups aren’t prepared?

At a recent presentation to a large group of physicians, I had the  opportunity to poll attendees on their current state of preparation for ICD-10.  Only 15% of attendees acknowledged that they had, as of yet, done anything to  prepare for ICD-10. The potential effect on hospitals and health systems is  profound. Yet, a much broader risk has not been fully appreciated, and it will  negatively affect health systems, particularly their physician executives. Many  independent or small group practice physicians haven’t yet grasped the reality  that their professional income will cease if they are not prepared to submit  ICD-10 compliant bills as of Oct. 1, 2014. So what will happen as we approach  the deadline?

As is typical in human nature, there comes a point where individuals  recognize the inevitability of change and begin to adapt. As physicians  recognize the necessity of ICD-10 compliance and their inability to assess their  preparedness, train their staff and acquire and implement necessary technologies  (the cost of which they may not be able to absorb), they will need to turn to  some entity for help — and survival.

The inevitable partner will be a larger entity which has prepared for the  ICD-10 transition — that is the hospital or health system. Here’s the  challenge. At the very time when a hospital/health system CFO is facing the  potential of up to a 50% decrease in coder productivity, increases in Discharged  Not Final Billed charts (awaiting ICD-10 clarifications) and at least  transitional revenue impact, physicians will be requesting (or more accurately  demanding) acquisition to allow their survival.

The message is clear. Even for health systems with a high percentage of  employed physicians, it is critical to partner now with your independent  physicians, as well to assist them in maintaining self-sufficiency during the  expensive and potentially difficult transition to ICD-10.

Physicians must have specialty-specific education regarding necessary  documentation for ICD-10 in order to not negatively impact coder productivity  and the entire revenue cycle. Proactive hospitals are planning to provide this  education to their medical staff through a phased approach utilizing learning  management systems and expert content delivered via a peer-to-peer,  physician-to-physician format. That will greatly mitigate the risks of the  ICD-10 transition and will clearly decrease the level of rework, improve coder  productivity and positively affect physician satisfaction and an organization’s  bottom-line.

Source: iHealthBeat

The post When it Comes to ICD-10 Physician Documentation: Collaborate and Educate appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

The Slow Crawl Toward Improved EHR Usability and Interoperability 28 Jun 2013 7:35 AM (11 years ago)

Well-developed electronic health records hold the promise of helping health  care professionals improve patient care and deliver it more efficiently, and the  American Medical Association recognizes that enhancing EHR usability and  interoperability will further ensure our nation’s goal of a high-performing  health care system. Physicians are generally prolific users of technology: new  patient monitoring devices, diagnostic imaging, equipment and advanced surgical  tools, to name a few. In each case, physicians have adopted these tools quickly  and became proficient users — and they have done so without the need for a  national incentive program. Why is it, then, that so many physicians are still  trying to incorporate EHRs into their practices?

While the Medicare/Medicaid EHR incentive program can be credited with  sparking a rapid adoption of health IT, it has also created negative  consequences. Swift implementation of certified EHRs, needed to obtain  incentives under the meaningful use program, has compelled physicians to  purchase tools not yet optimized to the individual user’s needs. These tools  often impede, rather than enable, efficient clinical care. EHRs can also pose  challenges as a physician attempts to meet documentation, coding and  billing requirements. AMA has been an outspoken advocate for health IT  improvements and continues to work with the federal government and other  stakeholders to advance usability and interoperability.

EHR Usability

According to the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society,  “usability is one of the major factors — possibly the most important factor —  hindering widespread adoption of [EHRs].” Surprisingly, the Office of the  National Coordinator for Health IT does not provide physicians any information  about the usability of EHRs that it certifies. Usability standards should be  included in ONC’s certification criteria to ensure that physicians are able to  invest in the EHR system that fits the needs of their practice.

Many physicians report they are unhappy with the EHR products available to  them, likely due to the fact that EHRs are still in an immature stage of  development. They find them clunky, confusing and complex, and they are  struggling to successfully incorporate EHRs into their workflow. According to a  recent survey of physicians by American EHR Partners,  approximately one-third of all surveyed physicians said that they were very  dissatisfied with their EHR and that it is becoming more difficult to return to  pre-EHR productivity levels.

Given this decrease in productivity, it is no surprise that since the start  of the meaningful use program, we’ve seen continued escalation in physician  dissatisfaction with their EHRs. According to the same American EHR Partners  survey, the percentage of physicians who would not recommend their EHRs to a  colleague increased from 24% to 39% between 2010 and 2012.

AMA also is concerned about the viability of the thousands of certified EHR  products. We’ve heard from many physicians who have invested in EHRs that have  gone out of business. These physicians, who were doing their best to adopt EHRs,  are now faced with the financial hardship of purchasing an entirely new system.  The uncertain future of an EHR extends beyond the product’s business model to  the security of the product’s certification status. In fact, ONC recently  revoked the certification of two EHR systems so providers cannot use those EHRs  to satisfy meaningful use requirements. Physicians who have already invested in  these now-uncertified systems will need to spend even more money on a new,  certified EHR to replace their non-certified EHR or face a penalty.

EHR Interoperability

In addition to the usability challenges surrounding the use of EHRs,  physicians also face a nascent and often uncertain health information exchange  environment, including interoperability challenges associated with the ability  of different EHR systems to share patient information with one another. Unless  physicians and other health care providers are able to securely, accurately and  effectively exchange health data about their patients, health IT’s promise for  enabling high-quality and efficient care cannot be realized. A survey by the Bipartisan Policy Center revealed that more  than 70% of clinicians surveyed identified lack of interoperability, lack of an  information exchange infrastructure and cost of setting up and maintaining  interfaces and exchanges as major barriers to health IT use.

Interoperability of EHRs will become more of an issue as physicians attempt  to successfully participate in advanced stages of meaningful use. The meaningful  use program has been structured such that each stage calls for physicians to  meet an increasing number of requirements, including ones that call for more  robust data exchange. This requires expensive, customized EHR interfaces so  physicians can connect with other systems. Simply increasing the data exchange  requirements physicians must meet in meaningful use will not solve the  underlying challenges that persist around the operability of EHRs and HIE,  things that are generally outside the average practicing physician’s control.  Adding to this are the ongoing concerns that the requirements for meeting  meaningful use are too one-size fits all and don’t accommodate all the different  physician practice patterns and workflows. Layering these requirements on top of  requirements that mandate physicians use certified systems that are clunky to  use makes for a challenging adoption environment.

Physicians are doing their best to successfully adopt health IT, but more  must be done to advance usability and interoperability. AMA is actively engaged  with the administration to communicate the concerns of physicians and is pushing  for criteria that would make certified EHR systems more user friendly for  physicians and meaningful use Stage 2 requirements more flexible. While we  believe that CMS and ONC’s decision to postpone rulemaking for Stage 3 is  helpful, more must be done to address concerns with Stage 2, which begins Jan.  1, 2014. AMA will continue to highlight these issues and press CMS and ONC to  address them before that date.

Source: iHealthBeat

The post The Slow Crawl Toward Improved EHR Usability and Interoperability appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

Efficient Patient Communication and Engagement 13 Jun 2013 11:53 AM (11 years ago)

How do you communicate with your patients?

As you know, Patient Relationship Management is becoming a huge topic for providers/practices and they are looking for ways to improve the overall engagement process with their patients. The below information will provide several ways our solution is improving the way practices communicate with their patients. I would love to discuss this further to determine what areas we might be able to improve your clinic’s patient engagement process.

Appointment Reminders

Reminding patients of their appointments at the right time, with the right media, and using the right message can dramatically improve your efficiency as an organization. Missed appointment notifications can also be an opportunity for revenue if handled properly. Let our best-practice solutions go to work for you today!

Preventive HealthCare Alerts

Custom, provider-specific criteria chosen in the Relatient cloud-based interface creates a policy of automatic health reminder events that will contact patients on behalf of their care provider, and will enable a personalized outreach effort that is both consistent and effortless. Use the power of text messaging, email, automated voice, and social media to enable a more compliant and healthy patient population.

Collections Reminders

Focusing on the forgetful & distracted patient accounts by deploying timely automatic reminders can take away extra cost and burden of manual follow-up, while insuring that every possible dollar is collected before an account is written off or sent to an expensive collections agency. Deploying automated collections reminders while giving your account holders the opportunity to settle balances immediately will give your organization new financial advantages.

Mass Notifications

Occasionally, you may have a message that needs to be heard across your patient population, or by a filtered sub-section. In seconds, Relatient can notify your patients or other population targets with any message you desire.

Patient Satisfaction Surveys

Satisfaction surveys are not only healthy for your business, but they are becoming mandatory in order to participate with certain healthcare plans. Relatient simplifies the process and makes Patient Satisfaction Survey results available anytime via our robust online reporting engine.

Benefits

There is no hardware or software to purchase! With our superior customer service and competitive pricing, we are sure that our solution will be a huge asset to your practice!

The post Efficient Patient Communication and Engagement appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

ONC Issues Guidance on Stage 2 Transition of Care Requirements 31 May 2013 4:47 AM (11 years ago)

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT has issued guidance on how health information exchange  organizations and health IT service providers can help health care providers  meet the transition of care measures under Stage 2 of the meaningful use  program, Clinical Innovation & Technology reports  (Pedulli, Clinical Innovation & Technology, 5/13).

Background

Under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package, health care providers who  demonstrate meaningful use of certified electronic health record systems can  qualify for Medicaid and Medicare incentive payments.

The Stage 2 transition of care measures require eligible health care  providers and hospitals to use certified EHR systems or information exchanges  to:

Guidance Details

ONC’s guidance states that health information service providers and health  information exchange organizations can support providers in meeting the  transition of care measures in various way, such as by:

The guidance also includes information on:

Source: iHealthBeat

The post ONC Issues Guidance on Stage 2 Transition of Care Requirements appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

Drugmakers Leverage Doctor, Patient Data To Market Their Products 31 May 2013 4:45 AM (11 years ago)

Many pharmaceutical companies use vast databases of patient and doctor  information to market their products, raising concerns among some experts and  privacy advocates, the New York Times reports.

About the Databases

The databases are maintained by organizations like research firm IMS Health,  which began tracking patient data in the 1990s. Data tracked by IMS includes  patients’:

In 2011, IMS expanded its collection of patient data by acquiring a company  — SDI Health — that tracked patients’:

According to the Times, some drug companies leverage the databases to  promote their products to major industry players, such as insurers, by showing  that their drugs are more cost-effective or lead to better patient outcomes.

Pharmaceutical firms also say that the databases help them provide doctors  with information tailored to meet their needs.

Andrew Kress, a senior vice president at IMS, said, “You can read a dark side  to any of this, but the reality is that most manufacturers that IMS does  research for are really trying to engage in a much more productive dialogue with  the health care providers.”

Experts, Advocates Raise Concerns

Although HIPAA requires that personally identifiable data be removed from the  databases, some experts say that the use of personal information to sell drugs  still raises privacy concerns.

In addition, privacy advocates note that research has shown that individuals’  de-identified information sometimes can be re-identified.

Jerry Avorn, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, said, “I  think the doctors tend not to be aware of the depths to which they are being  analyzed and studied by people trying to sell them drugs and other medical  products.” He added, “Almost by definition, a lot of this stuff happens under  the radar — there may be a sales pitch, but the doctor may not know that sales  pitch is being informed by their own prescribing patterns” (Thomas, New York  Times, 5/16).

Source: IHealthBeat

The post Drugmakers Leverage Doctor, Patient Data To Market Their Products appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?

Consumer Organizations Defend Meaningful Use Program 31 May 2013 4:44 AM (11 years ago)

A coalition of consumer organizations has sent a letter to six Republican senators calling for the  meaningful use program to be bolstered, taking issue with a letter and white paper from the senators saying the program should be  rebooted, FierceEMR reports (Durben Hirsch, FierceEMR,  5/16).

Background

Under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package, health care providers who  demonstrate meaningful use of certified electronic health record systems can  qualify for Medicaid and Medicare incentive payments.

On April 16, the GOP senators released a 28-page white paper — titled,  “REBOOT: Re-examining the Strategies Needed to Successfully Adopt Health IT” —  outlining their concerns about current federal health IT policy.

The white paper accompanied a letter that the six lawmakers sent to HHS  Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. The letter requested information about the agency’s  progress in promoting EHR adoption through the meaningful use program.

The six Republican senators who released the white paper and signed the  letter are:

In the white paper, the lawmakers acknowledged that the meaningful use  program aims to improve health care quality and reduce costs. However, they  wrote, “nearly four years after the enactment … we see evidence that the  program is at risk of not achieving its goals and that $35 billion in taxpayer  money is being spent ineffectively in the process” (iHealthBeat,  4/17).

Details of Coalition’s Letter

The coalition — led by the Consumer Partnership for eHealth and the Campaign  for Better Care — defended the EHR incentive program and lauded Congress for  developing a quick, phased-in approach to health IT adoption (FierceEMR,  5/16).

The letter stated that it is “imperative” to keep meaningful use rulemaking  on its “intended trajectory and implement the lessons learned in order to ensure  that the outlay of public funds through this program results in a healthier  population, better care and more affordable health care costs.”

According to the letter, any delay or retooling of the meaningful use program  would:

Source: iHealthBeat

 

The post Consumer Organizations Defend Meaningful Use Program appeared first on Pulse Practice Solutions, Document Management, Document Scanning, EMR, Marketing & Managed IT for Medical Practices.

Add post to Blinklist Add post to Blogmarks Add post to del.icio.us Digg this! Add post to My Web 2.0 Add post to Newsvine Add post to Reddit Add post to Simpy Who's linking to this post?